Quote:
Originally Posted by stundt1
I put 1511 in over 191 for this year because after FLR. 1511 improved a lot in my eyes though they were at a tough second regional. 191 and 1511 were very close in overall robot performance but I think 1511 was a little better this year.
This is asking for robot performance of 2012 and not any other year right ? If its over multiple years then my vote would be different.
|
I've been having the same argument in my head of 1511 v 191. I can absolutely see why you'd pick 1511, and I was very close to as well. They had an amazingly designed robot and played the game very well. I, however, picked 191 because I felt like they used their design more effectively. 1511 could definitely do more in a match than 191, but I felt that if you broke it down to scoring and balancing, 191 had the edge. That said, 1511 is an insanely close second, and if we were picking the top 4 team, at least we'd all agree on who New York gets
And yeah, I think it's just for 2012. If it were all years, HAVE to give the edge to 191. You can't argue with 21 years!