View Single Post
  #114   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-06-2012, 19:20
lemiant's Avatar
lemiant lemiant is offline
the Dreamer
AKA: Alex
FRC #4334 (Alberta Tech Alliance)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 562
lemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond reputelemiant has a reputation beyond repute
Re: IRI Rule Changes - 2012

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis Hoffman View Post
Does any of the below really surprise anyone?

Folks are welcome to correct any of these.

This is in reference to #3 rule change only.

PRO #3 (or NOT-CON - neutrality in posting infers pro. Being on the planning committee infers pro - makes sense, right?):
  • 33 (W)
  • 67 (W)
  • 68 (W)
  • 234 (W)
  • 341 (W)
  • 829 (W)
  • 868 (SQ)
  • 907 (W)
  • 3940 (W)
  • 4334 (W)
CON #3 (or ain't no big thang we'll beat it anyway, or triples are overrated, or we should add 10 points to the coop bridge as an option, or.... ):
  • 48 (L)
  • 340 (L)
  • 359 (L)
  • 461 (L)
  • 548 (L)
  • 744 (L)
  • 772 (L)
  • 2056 (L)
  • 2168 (L)
  • 2337 (L)
  • 3193 (L)
  • 3310 (L)
I also know of one other longbot team attending who is not in favor of #3 but does not believe the net disadvantage toward longs will be that large. I'm tending to agree with that person, but I am of the mind that any unfairness at all is blar.
This is an interesting list. Your addition of "ain't no big thing, we'll beat it" and "triples are overrated" to opposing the change is really inaccurate though. Go back, read Tyler's post. Him and anyone with similar opinions are definitely in the pro (or at least neutral) camp
Reply With Quote