View Single Post
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 29-06-2012, 20:41
PAR_WIG1350's Avatar
PAR_WIG1350 PAR_WIG1350 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alan Wells
FRC #1350 (Rambots)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,188
PAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Smog draft1 DiscoBots 2587 Offseason robot

Quote:
Originally Posted by n1ckd2012 View Post
I like their implementation however I feel that is is easier to achieve super high wheelies with my version. I will draft up a cheesypoof style lift for comparison. Thanks for pointing that design out!

The current piston stroke is 5 inches. I might increase the stroke for a higher wheelie.
The implementation used by the Cheesypoofs places the cylinder rod in tension. This is a much safer method than one that places the rod in compression since there is less of a chance of bending the rod. Any deflection on a rod in tension will be resisted (for the same reason a string in tension tends to remain straight. However if the rod is in compression, the deflection will cause the force of the cylinder to move out of alignment generating torque to bend the rod. My biggest concern would be if the rollers were to hit anything at appreciable speed.
__________________
Reply With Quote