View Single Post
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-07-2012, 11:03
jvriezen jvriezen is offline
Registered User
FRC #3184 (Burnsville Blaze)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Burnsville, MN
Posts: 636
jvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond repute
Re: IRI Ball denial and G31

Quote:
Originally Posted by jspatz1 View Post
The strategy is not to keep the balls for human player shots. The strategy is to gain control of most of the balls (hoarding), then score with them (with robots) late in the match when it is too late for your opponent to score with them again. Not promoting it as wise, just explaining the concept. Again it would take great confidence, execution, and timing.
The strategy can also be useful when you know your opposition plays a better tele-op game (higher points per ball acquired.) The more balls that cycle thru the more point differential they will accumulate for tele-op points. If you know you have a large enough lead after autonomous, or think that you can out score them in bridge points to make up the current deficit, then it may be to your advantage to 'slow down' tele-op where your opponents are able to out gun you, as the effect is minimized through starvation.

Shooting your possessed ball (going for 2pts or a lower % 3pt attempt) and turning the ball over to your opponent who has a higher shooting % is not a good idea when you are ahead ( or know you will be at end of game based on bridge success predictions.)
__________________
John Vriezen
FRC, Mentor, Inspector #3184 2016- #4859 2015, #2530 2010-2014 FTC Mentor, Inspector #7152 2013-14
Reply With Quote