Thread: Press Fit
View Single Post
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-07-2012, 14:28
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,508
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Press Fit

This is an area where standardizing in design can make things a lot easier. If you only use a few common sizes of bearings, then you can get the appropriate reamers for these bearings (at some expense, but not awful; and due to design standardization they're used almost everywhere on the robot).

We have a press fit and slip fit (press being .0005 to .001 under depending on the availability of the reamers) for most bearings and bushings we use.

Most 973 robots over the past few years have most gearing running on plates that were waterjetted then reamed out by a reamer in a hand drill.

The reamer is really the best compromise between precision and the ability to use it on any given part and machine. It also allows "fixing" of damaged or out of tolerance parts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by squirrel View Post
fwiw, we made a couple gear boxes this year using flanged bearings and polycarbonate side plates, we discovered that drilling a hole with a Forstner bit will provide a sufficient press fit. There are lots of ways to do things like this.
Materials like polycarbonate that are much softer/weaker than the bearing itself will allow a much greater range of bore sizes without undue damage to or efficiency loss in the bearing.