|
Re: [FTC]: FTC 2011 - 2012 Reflection and 2012 - 2013 Speculation
Regarding changing the rules midway - absolutely not! Sure clarify them, tweak them to correct an unforeseen effect, but midway major changes, no way. We all know the teams strategize, plan, and design to the released rules and to change them midstream would just breed frustration. I do think that the games need to have multiple ways to practically achieve a solid score in competition.
Regarding the Tetrix system and the use of non-kit parts like aluminum square tubing or channel; awesome! I think that the rules need to include more possibilities with materials, electronics, etc. I don't exactly understand limiting to what is used except for safety reasons. If it was more open then materials could be used from a variety of sources and likely cost less.
I might be opening a can of worms here but sometimes I get the feeling that when limiting the parts to one and only one source (i.e. servos from Tetrix - can also be purchased elsewhere) serves someone else and not the participants, their sponsors and the ultimate goal of the entire affair. Sure it needs to be reasonable and not let a few teams with huge amounts of money (and there are not many) get an advantage over other teams by the fact that they do have the funds.
I think open the doors and let a bunch more parts sources and type of parts in. For instance with the access to 3D printers growing - allow printed ABS parts. Definitely do not roll back the materials allowed so far. How about cameras, GPS, clutches, wheels, etc.? (what else do you think?)
|