View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-07-2012, 11:05
shawnz shawnz is offline
Flamewar Initiator
FRC #0907 (E. Y. Cybernetics)
Team Role: Programmer
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 36
shawnz will become famous soon enough
Re: Possible solution to Eisenstein problems.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BornaE View Post
point 3 is completely legal. The system operates within the appointed slot given by the FCC. however, the system would not use the standard channels defined by the IEEE.
Sounds reasonable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BornaE View Post
4 cannot be implemented next year without replacing all the radios used in the field and robot. I hope this happens.
Why? The AP surely already has the functionality (it's quite sophisticated AFAIK), and the robot radios don't share networks with each other. What would be the requirement?

Quote:
Originally Posted by efoote868 View Post
Get a robot controller that reboots in under 3 seconds.
I don't want to start another NI/IFI debate (disclaimer: i'm on the NI side), but the cRIO boot time surely could be improved at least a bit, even with current hardware. I mean, vxworks isn't *that* heavy. I've seen PCs boot faster than our cRIO.

Last edited by shawnz : 14-07-2012 at 11:07.
Reply With Quote