Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseK
If the team had tried a shooting mechanism this year then that defense may have left them with a different post-match situation.
|
Yeah, and if 2791 built a swerve this year we probably wouldn't have moved. What's your point?
4334 built a fabulous robot within their means that performed objectively better than many teams with shooting mechanisms. Their ability to honestly evaluate their capabilities and to choose a robot type that would get them success on the field (without a shooter) is exactly why they were so successful this year. Yes, if they built a shooter they would have been worse - but they didn't!
Seriously, we should have built that robot this year, and I bet a lot of FIRST is saying the same thing. Or at least in my opinion they should be.