View Single Post
  #56   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-08-2012, 13:50
EricVanWyk EricVanWyk is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,597
EricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond reputeEricVanWyk has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to EricVanWyk
Re: Coefficient of Friction Testing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ether View Post
Curvature of the Earth


Maybe curvature of the gravitational field, but at that point we are back to complaining that the weight of the people moving in the stands are throwing off the accelerometer measurements.

I'm just trying to understand out how much of the spread is due to mismeasuring the angle, and how much is from other sources. As soon as it starts moving, it goes into kinetic friction. So, if you jostle the setup it will start moving before it 'should'. My untested hypothesis is that this thread is focusing too much on the angle, and not enough on things like how quickly you raise the ramp, or how steady your hand is.

So - is your money better spent on a better inclinometer, or keeping the freshmen away from the red bull?