Quote:
Originally Posted by quinxorin
The interruption lasted for three seconds, according to the 548 report. Furthermore, according to the report, he did not intend to alter the outcome of the match, but instead wanted to show the field personnel that field hacking was in fact possible. That's okay with me.
|
The intent is okay with me too, don't get me wrong. But proving it on the biggest stage possible? That's not cool with me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by quinxorin
No. That would not be okay with me. However, a brief (three second) interruption that does not influence match outcome is.
|
Even a three second interruption interferes with the outcome of the match. For many teams, it takes them only that much time to shoot three baskets.
Quote:
Originally Posted by akoscielski3
PS: ^ look at this Lawerence guy.
|
^ Look at this Koscielski guy, he can't even spell my name right.
Okay, before this thread crashes, lets go back to praising 548 for saying "we're sorry."
-Nick