View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-08-2012, 00:20
Mk.32's Avatar
Mk.32 Mk.32 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Mark
FRC #2485 (W.A.R. Lords)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 770
Mk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud of
Re: pic: Single Speed Gearbox Iterations

Quote:
Originally Posted by JVN View Post
You can get that entire reduction in 1 stage. Lighter, simpler, more efficient.

12:72 will work with a 4" wheel, and actually gets more reduction than you have right now. (12:69 would be right about where you are currently.)

I always use a 12t or smaller on my CIMs because it allows us to put the gear on the CIM before installing it through the CIM 0.75" pilot hole.

Instead of spending money on COTS gears, you could go find a local shop who can make you some custom aluminum 72-toothers for cheap (or free). You're not going to need a whole lot of gear, should be nice and light.

-John
Quick question from this; because we like to be able to put the gear on the CIM before we put it in the gearbox, I bored the CIM mounting holes to about .9 so a 14th would fit though it; so does it really matter that you use a .75 pilot hole?
__________________
Engineering mentor: Team 2485: WARLords 2013-

Team President: Team 3647 2010-2013
Reply With Quote