View Single Post
  #141   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 23-08-2012, 15:31
qnetjoe qnetjoe is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joe Daily
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 51
qnetjoe is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to qnetjoe Send a message via MSN to qnetjoe Send a message via Yahoo to qnetjoe
Re: Team 548 Einstein Statement

Quote:
Originally Posted by DMetalKong View Post
I think that breaking things could be acceptable for use in FRC if the need is strong enough. As long as only firmware is changing, and not hardware, the cost of deployment would not be as great as an entirely custom solution..
There is really no sense in reinventing the wheel. IEEE has been working on protected management frames for a long time. There is a standard called 802.11w-2009 that does this and it was ratified in 2009 and was recently superseded by 802.11-2012 which was just the merging of ten amendments together to help prevent forking.

The next step in the process would be to find hardware that meets FIRST budget and that meets these standard.

just my two cents

If you want to track the 802.11 WG progress/projects here a good link to start off with

http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/1..._Timelines.htm