Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard
I'd have to confirm this, but an undercut shouldn't be any less efficient. It just needs the tooth to be reduced in size near the base to prevent impact of teeth; the involute surface should still be maintained.
It really is a substantial strength decrease; but as shown by numerous robots running them they are still strong enough.
|
In the first stage of a gearbox the force would be lower than it would be in later stages so the effect is minimized, identical gears in later stages might not fare as well. This is why the gear teeth in the fisher price gearbox get larger with each successive stage.