View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 30-08-2012, 13:12
Adrian Clark Adrian Clark is offline
Registered User
FRC #1678 (Citrus Circuits)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: United States
Posts: 79
Adrian Clark is a jewel in the roughAdrian Clark is a jewel in the roughAdrian Clark is a jewel in the roughAdrian Clark is a jewel in the rough
Re: Ground clearance

Quote:
Originally Posted by stinglikeabee View Post
I find the raised front with appopriately placed CG works exceptionally well in maneuverability and stability. For instance, we were able to rotate in place while balanced on the bridge in Rebound Rumble.
I don't doubt your maneuverability at all, it sounds like the set of four wheels you pivot around has a pretty short wheelbase, meaning low scrub and good maneuverability.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stinglikeabee View Post
I might be mistaken with the CG of the OP's drop center, as I was expecting a CG placed over the center wheels for optimum rotation.
Typically with a drop center you don't want to have CG perfectly centered, this only adds unnecessary teter-tottering and reduces your outside wheels contact with the ground.

Quote:
Originally Posted by stinglikeabee View Post
Moving forward with this assumption, would the robot not require a forward vector to pivot to the rear 4 wheels when turning, thus negating the ability to turn in place?
Not necessarily, even if the CG is perfectly centered the robot will always be resting on either set of four wheels. I'm not too sure I understand your logic here, why would the robot not be able to turn in place in your given scenario?
Reply With Quote