View Single Post
  #53   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-09-2012, 16:32
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 8,091
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Blogged - The 2015 Control System Request for Proposa

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1075guy View Post
its excessive horsepower has enabled teams to get sloppy with their coding, resulting in 100% cpu usage
I have a modest proposal: Can we use a phrase other than "100% CPU usage" to describe the situation where the code is not meeting its deadlines?

Many well-designed safety critical systems use the CPU 100%: They have a low priority background task which uses all available CPU when none of the higher priority foreground tasks are running. So "100% CPU" is not necessarily a bad thing.

Perhaps the phrase "throughput margin" captures the intended meaning.

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/p...ain_H-1860.pdf


http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=107733


Reply With Quote