View Single Post
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-09-2012, 18:13
AdamHeard's Avatar
AdamHeard AdamHeard is offline
Lead Mentor
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Atascadero
Posts: 5,506
AdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond reputeAdamHeard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AdamHeard
Re: Timing belt in drive success

Quote:
Originally Posted by ratdude747 View Post
IIRC it used all KOP sized belts and Pulleys. The ones with the really shallow teeth.

I still think that chains are better for high torque situations...
This is unfounded opinion though. What is better? I can spec a chain and belt to handle the same power output no problem. This kind of opinion on chief could potentially misinform less experienced users.

We used Gates gt2 belts exclusively on our 2012 robot on nearly every system (ranging from tiny tiny 2mm to big 5mm) without issue. The gt2 profile is FAR superior to generical XL/MXL belts people are probably used to, and are better than it'd predecessor from gates (HTD) which comes in the kop

Gates provides all the necessary equations to determine if the belt is strong enough. If the belt fails, you did something wrong; either it was under/over tensioned or it was simply too small to use (both are verifiable items).