Quote:
Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery
The new wild card system is far from being perfectly fair, but show me a system that is fair. I can't believe anyone would actually object to that change, as it's clearly more "fair" (in terms of allocating spots to deserving/succesful teams) than the previous system. I don't see how anyone could argue that it's not an improvement over previous years.
And I'd hardly categorize attending an event where you have to compete against a team good enough to earn multiple bids to championship as "lucky."
|
You can't imagine? I know you have a better imagination than that
Oh and I never use the word fair.
My biggest objection is not to giving those extra spots out on a merit basis it's more about giving it to the runner-up alliance, I just don't think that would be the best way. How are they really anymore deserving of the spot than any other alliance that the regional winner defeated? They just had better timing.
I would much rather see them reward teams that did well during the qualifying part of the tournament. That would at least give some extra emphasis to doing well in qualifying.
Heck I would prefer they eliminate the automatic rookie seeds and give those spots out on a merit basis also.