[Siri]

As far as I can tell, these are the would-be wildcards for each multi-qualifying team.
Letters signify whether they went to Worlds anyway: 9(6) yes, 10(13) no.
Teams in parentheses would have wild-carded if double-qualifying a one event (first or otherwise) would have generated another card (as corrected and discussed above)

16: 111Y, 3676N
48: (2641N), 2481N
148: 2948N
181: 1071Y
233: (180Y), 125Y
234: (2386N)
246: (125Y)
281: (2642Y)
340: 188N, (1551N)
359: 624Y
384: (346N)
971: 1868Y
987: 2034N
1114: (610Y), 1503N
1311: 2614Y
1477: 2992N
1507: 1270N
1540: (2389N)
1592: 79Y
1714: (2052N)
1717: 1323Y
1983: (3663N)
1985: (1288N)
1986: 1208Y
2046: (1510N)
2056: 3161N, (244Y) 2852N
2169: (2220Y)
**3940: (3193N)
3990: (176N)
4001: (2634N)
4226: (3293N)


I haven't checked the second-tier rundown (i.e. if the the pre-qualification of these wildcards would have wild-card qualified someone else later). The most striking thing about this list to me though, is that many multi-qualifiers actually didn't generate extra spots (or at least as many as they should). I think it's 19 and 19? The wildcard system would have sent 10 more teams to World last year, but omitted 13 simply because the teams that beat them did it at one event instead of two or their first event instead of their second.