View Single Post
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-09-2012, 00:10
MattRain MattRain is offline
AZ FTC AF, FTC #2844 and FTC #8640
FRC #1492 (Team Caution)
Team Role: RoboCoach
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Posts: 317
MattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant futureMattRain has a brilliant future
Re: [FTC]: Extent of Possession

This question has come up on the offical fourms.

Quote:


Originally Posted by FTC6043

Q: If a robot was in possession of the ring at the back of a full dispenser, and in the process of removing it, the other 5 rings were pushed off the dispenser (generally moving with the robot, but fully supported by the dispenser) until they fell off the dispenser and to the floor, would that be a violation of <GR2>?
A: The action described doesn't violate rule <GR2>. Rings that are fully supported by the Dispenser are not subject to the Possession rule <GR2>.
Reply With Quote