|
Re: [MCC] Minimum Competitive Concept 2005
I loved our 2005 drive base, we went about our business without any issue 
From a manipulator standpoint, the 217/229 giant cross is as simple and reliable as it got, IMO (or another post with stabilizer bar, just loved how big 217s was).
I LOVED how 179 played the game in 2005. Extremely fast, well driven, "roundish" style drive base which made it hard to get in their way. They focused on the lower goals, but could get a tetra on the center if they needed to. The "rake" style manipulator worked awesomely as it helped minimize the accuracy required by the driver to pick up a tetra. Loved that robot, and it was stupid simple.
-Brando
__________________
MORT (Team 11) '01-'05 :
-2005 New Jersey Regional Chairman's Award Winners
-2013 MORT Hall of Fame Inductee
NUTRONs (Team 125) '05-???
2007 Boston Regional Winners
2008 & 2009 Boston Regional Driving Tomorrow's Technology Award
2010 Boston Regional Creativity Award
2011 Bayou Regional Finalists, Innovation in Control Award, Boston Regional Finalists, Industrial Design Award
2012 New York City Regional Winners, Boston Regional Finalists, IRI Mentor of the Year
2013 Orlando Regional Finalists, Industrial Design Award, Boston Regional Winners, Pine Tree Regional Finalists
2014 Rhode Island District Winners, Excellence in Engineering Award, Northeastern University District Winners, Industrial Design Award, Pine Tree District Chairman's Award, Pine Tree District Winners
2015 South Florida Regional Chairman's Award, NU District Winners, NEDCMP Industrial Design Award, Hopper Division Finalists, Hopper/Newton Gracious Professionalism Award
|