View Single Post
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-10-2012, 13:21
rees2001 rees2001 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Rees
FRC #0340 (Greater Rochester Robotics)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 802
rees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond reputerees2001 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Success with encoders

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark McLeod View Post
I've always liked using enclosed models like the Grayhill 61K, 63K/R (example).
A 63R is guaranteed for 10 years of continuous use at 5000rpm. We're still running them on a robot from 2004.
For drive train or shooter type applications look for encoders with a high rotational life, ball bearings, etc.
Lighter duty applications can use cheaper alternatives by using bearing sleeves, lower rpm ratings, etc.

Depending on the application you might consider absolute or incremental, quadrature, BCD, etc.
Analog models are easy to deal with and the FRC cRIO is setup to handle them. Other connection methods tend to cost more.

Do be careful to match the counts-per-revolution to the application and the capabilities of the cRIO to handle the maximum counts-per-second you design for.
Where is the like button?

I prefer the greyhill's. They work well with kids that my not understand the robustness of the KOP encoders.