Thread: 80/20 Inc.
View Single Post
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-10-2012, 09:19
Siri's Avatar
Siri Siri is offline
Dare greatly
AKA: 1640 coach 2010-2014
FRC #2641 (PCCR; Refs & RIs)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,638
Siri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond reputeSiri has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via ICQ to Siri
Re: 80/20 Inc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis View Post
Last year, I saw team with a bunch of 80/20 on their robot come in 30+ lbs over the weight limit at a pre-ship scrimmage... I believe they made the limit just by replacing that with simple 1" square stock.
Regarding the weight issue, be careful how you replace 80/20. The common (and lightest) 1" square profile (1010), is .5097lb/ft. Compare to different 6061-T6 Al profiles.

lb/ft............Extrusion Profile..............................Length req. for -30lbs
0.513.........1" (1/8") square tube......................N/A
0.5097......80/20 1010 Profile.......................N/A
0.410.........1" (1/8") channel.............................301ft
0.285.........1" (1/16") square tube....................134ft
0.280.........1" (1/8") angle......................,.........131ft
Values vary slightly, primarily depending on the exact extrusion spec (AA, AS, etc).

Depending on your application, you'll likely be able to get away with lighter-weight extrusions in many situations (U-channel is usually* a reasonable structural substitute), but it's not as big a difference as many think.


*As in not always.
__________________