View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 20-10-2012, 18:06
connor.worley's Avatar
connor.worley connor.worley is offline
Registered User
FRC #0973 (Greybots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Berkeley/San Diego
Posts: 601
connor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond reputeconnor.worley has a reputation beyond repute
Reaching maximum efficiency

After seeing many EXTREMELY competitive performances from teams this year (1717 and 987 stood out to me personally, but there are others; too many to list), I've wondered: Are teams building robots that play the game perfectly (ignoring factors like price, etc.)?

Another robot that comes to mind was 254 in 2011.

If teams are reaching "maximum efficiency," should FIRST take this into consideration in the design of future games? If so, how?
__________________
Team 973 (2016-???)
Team 5499 (2015-2016)
Team 254 (2014-2015)

Team 1538 (2011-2014)
2014 Driver (25W 17L 1T)
日本語でOK
Reply With Quote