View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-10-2012, 04:35
Mr. Lim Mr. Lim is offline
Registered User
AKA: Mr. Lim
no team
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 1,125
Mr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond reputeMr. Lim has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Turning Quality Metrics

I'll propose a turnability metric:

Angular Speed / Linear Speed

where:

Angular Speed is the max degrees/sec in an on-axis, in-place spin.
Linear Speed is the top speed in feet/sec in a straight line.

Both measured on standard FRC carpet, of course.

I'd be interested in hearing from some experienced multi-speed gearbox teams about a metric like this. Lower gears would likely produce a better turnability score than a higher gear, but I've had drivers who simply "like how the robot turns" in high gear much better. Have you seen this as well?

This leads me to believe there is such thing as a robot that "turns just right," which is supported by the discussion here regarding having too much overshoot.

It'd be neat to quantify what the "perfect turnability" is for different FRC tasks - traversing the field to get game pieces in 2011 vs spinning on axis to line up a shooter in 2012. Are they different enough to justify having two gears?
__________________
In life, what you give, you keep. What you fail to give, you lose forever...