View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 24-10-2012, 20:33
DampRobot's Avatar
DampRobot DampRobot is offline
Physics Major
AKA: Roger Romani
FRC #0100 (The Wildhats) and FRC#971 (Spartan Robotics)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Stanford University
Posts: 1,277
DampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond reputeDampRobot has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Open vs Closed Gearboxes

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.C. View Post
Why we do it:

-Lighter
-Less parts
-Internals are Visible
-Easy maintenance (Dog shifters, Chain etc..)
-Easier to teach new kids (not really a design decision just a benefit)

-RC
This. In my experience, unless grease splatter is a major concern, open is almost always better, mostly because of weight. For example, running a Toughbox with delrin spacers instead of the usual aluminium enclosure saves over half a pound per robot. We ran them that way, and aside from a little grease getting thrown around, they ran like champs.

You may be a little too worried about stuff getting in the gearbox, and not considering the maintenance and weight benefits. I personally have never seen a gearbox fail from foreign material inside. Usually, binding that you might think was caused by stuff getting caught in the gears is caused by improper grease use.
__________________
The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be lighted.

-Plutarch