View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-11-2012, 16:25
jvriezen jvriezen is offline
Registered User
FRC #3184 (Burnsville Blaze)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Burnsville, MN
Posts: 642
jvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond reputejvriezen has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What's the verdict of on-robot cameras?

From a common sense point of view:

On board cameras during real competitions provide a great public relations aspect to promoting FIRST and FRC. My thoughts:
  • Restrictions on WiFi are certainly reasonable
  • Restrictions against using the recorded footage for a competitive advantage within the same competition are reasonable (but hard to enforce, like many other rules.)
  • Including camera in bot weight, height, volume limit is reasonable
  • General safety considerations are reasonable
  • Disallowing due to battery is unreasonable
  • Disallowing due to budget limitation is marginal, but this should not usually be an issue anyway, since cameras can be had for <$400.
Of course the GDC's answer is final, but I would hope the rules are arranged so that we don't have to jump through hoops like getting waivers to get good video, like our Duluth Double Shot:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2KIVicKIOk
__________________
John Vriezen
FRC, Mentor, Inspector #3184 2016- #4859 2015, #2530 2010-2014 FTC Mentor, Inspector #7152 2013-14
Reply With Quote