Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber
I WOULD. However, my logical assumption would be that minimizing travel distance would be my priority metric. This is a naive assumption though since it could throw people into events they cannot attend for other reasons (timing for example). Whereas parts selection is relatively simple and doesn't have as many constraints. It'd be a simple matter of optimizing the top choices for teams. I guess I could apply this logic to events too.
|
Yes.
The priority should be set by the individual team (both for Events and FIRSTChoice). If team think the travel distance is important then they would use that metric when organising it. If traveling to events they have never attend then the sort their list accordingly.
As for Michigan and "home" events you easily run through teams that have signed up for their home event. Then you go to the teams pick list for events.
I still think you can still have people make a list for their 1st event. Then wait 2 weeks to use a new or same list for their 2nd events.
-Clinton-