View Single Post
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-12-2012, 00:19
MichaelBick MichaelBick is offline
Registered User
FRC #1836 (MilkenKnights)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 734
MichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant futureMichaelBick has a brilliant future
Elevators: Cascaded vs Continuous

To prepare for the season, I have been CADding different mechanisms to fit our teams resources. Right now I am working on an elevator, and am trying to decide how to rig it. I've seen both continuous(254) and cascaded(1114, 973, 971) work very well. I believe that continuous is more efficient(the first stage goes up first) but also that is harder organize your wire rope. On the other hand, cascaded is easier to rig, there are multiple ways you can implement it(chain, belt, and rack/pinion), and that it is less efficient. To make the best decision for my team, I would like to know:

1) Which method do you prefer? Why?

2) How have you solved the problems with each method?

3) What other problems have you run into? How did you solve them?
__________________
Team 1836 - The Milken Knights
2013 LA Regional Champions with 1717 and 973
2012 LA Regional Finalists with 294 and 973
To follow Team 1836 on Facebook, go to http://www.facebook.com/MilkenKnights
To go to our website, go to http://milkenknights.com/index.html

Last edited by MichaelBick : 13-12-2012 at 00:26.