Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJ
I would argue that CAD designs "made public" should also count as COTS.
Rewriting code that instead could be reused (outside of educational purposes) or designed for reuse in the first place is a "bad thing" and should not be encouraged (in my opinion).
|
To what
extent? (
further explanation)
To be fair to Cory (that post is from 2007), every time I've looked at 254's 'bots at champs (every year since '07) there's probably very little that goes through
no re-design of some sort due to new considerations.
Needless to say, there are many varied opinions.
My team uses pre-season items as prototyping platforms. Often times we'll have the entire drive train CAD'ed on the day of kickoff, just because we understand our simple drive trains that well. Then we fab the production drive train -- it's often similar to the prototype but it's never been identical. Only one part last year wound up being identical to the same part on 2011's robot, but that was after a design derivation and not a duplication. Seems to be within the spirit, even if we didn't
open-source our robot.