Thread: Ideal FRC Game
View Single Post
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-01-2013, 10:24
apalrd's Avatar
apalrd apalrd is offline
More Torque!
AKA: Andrew Palardy (Most people call me Palardy)
VRC #3333
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Auburn Hills, MI
Posts: 1,347
apalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond reputeapalrd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ideal FRC Game

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJackson View Post
On another note a game where we get to use six CIMs could be interesting....
What do you gain in a CIM over a FP or 550 motor?

-A lot of Weight
-Thermal mass
-A bit of power


You currently have up to 8 550-sized motors which provide a lot of power. For reference:
Code:
CIM: ~340w
RS 550 (Banebots): ~250w
RS 775 (Banebots): ~265w @12v
FP 9015: ~185w
FP 0673: ~290w
Andyprice: ~185w
Under 2012 motor rules, the RS 550's and FP's are not too far off CIM spec, and many of the motors are significantly more power-dense than a CIM. If used as a 6-motor drivetrain, for example, you KNOW that the CIM will spin the output under high load (so the 550 will be cooled, at least somewhat), and under very high load 6 motors will take the battery voltage down so low it doesn't even matter.

As for mechanisms, stalling anything will burn it up eventually. Don't stall it. Even a CIM dosen't really like to be stalled forever.

You have 8 HIGH POWERED MOTORS. You don't need any more CIMs.
__________________
Kettering University - Computer Engineering
Kettering Motorsports
Williams International - Commercial Engines - Controls and Accessories
FRC 33 - The Killer Bees - 2009-2012 Student, 2013-2014 Advisor
VEX IQ 3333 - The Bumble Bees - 2014+ Mentor

"Sometimes, the elegant implementation is a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function." ~ John Carmack
Reply With Quote