View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-01-2013, 08:36
Jared Russell's Avatar
Jared Russell Jared Russell is offline
Taking a year (mostly) off
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs), FRC #0341 (Miss Daisy)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,078
Jared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Robot climbing times

Quote:
Originally Posted by ENeyman View Post
Most of the time, 341 would shoot the two preloads before getting the two from the bridge. However, when against another robot who went for the bridge in auton (27, 233), they would go to the bridge first, intentionally taking the penalty.

Also, 365 would take the additional ball in auton too.
To be clear, we always hoped not to take the penalty when we did this. A lot of the time, one or more balls would not happen to roll into our intake and we'd leave the bridge loaded with 3 balls. But sometimes all of them did. We were never carded for doing it, but on a couple of occasions people expressed some displeasure that we were setting up the bot to incur a foul.

What choice did we have though? Risk a 3 point penalty and then score 6 points with the extra ball (EV +3)? Or don't go for the bridge at all, and give our opponents 12 free points (EV -12)?

IMO, a game mechanic that makes it mathematically advantageous to just eat the penalty is (a) designed to be exploited and/or (b) poorly thought out.
Reply With Quote