|
Re: Thoughts on whether the size change will be permanent?
Quote:
Originally Posted by connor.worley
Small robots cost less
|
We have yet to save any money due to the smaller footprint and extension limits. The metal itself is a small portion of our robot cost.
We have saved a lot of robot money in speed controllers and in many mechanical parts due to the new low-cost Vex Pro and reduced price AndyMark components. The savings from these two alone is far larger than reducing the robot size by 10", likely several orders of magnitude larger.
I am not a fan of the 54" cylinder including the bumper, but I don't mind the footprint rules.
__________________
Kettering University - Computer Engineering
Kettering Motorsports
Williams International - Commercial Engines - Controls and Accessories
FRC 33 - The Killer Bees - 2009-2012 Student, 2013-2014 Advisor
VEX IQ 3333 - The Bumble Bees - 2014+ Mentor
"Sometimes, the elegant implementation is a function. Not a method. Not a class. Not a framework. Just a function." ~ John Carmack
|