View Single Post
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2013, 11:42
Andy A. Andy A. is offline
Getting old
FRC #0095
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,015
Andy A. has a reputation beyond reputeAndy A. has a reputation beyond reputeAndy A. has a reputation beyond reputeAndy A. has a reputation beyond reputeAndy A. has a reputation beyond reputeAndy A. has a reputation beyond reputeAndy A. has a reputation beyond reputeAndy A. has a reputation beyond reputeAndy A. has a reputation beyond reputeAndy A. has a reputation beyond reputeAndy A. has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What Kind Of Metal Can We Use For FRC?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cal578 View Post
What rule has changed such that it might not pass now? I would expect that a COTS device, that has passed UL and such, would be ok.
Quote:
<R08> ROBOT parts shall not be made from hazardous materials, be unsafe, cause an unsafe condition, or interfere with the operation of other ROBOTS.
That'd be enough to give an inspector justification for nixing the above connector. Industrial mercury use is under very close scrutiny, and whether it's a commercial part or not doesn't necessarily matter anymore. My employer, for instance, wouldn't allow it unless I made a very thorough case for having no other practical option, documented a hazmat containment/cleanup plan, and an end of life disposal plan.

That's not to say the connector is illegal by default, just that it's in a gray area. I think any team wanting to use it these days would be facing a pretty hard sell with the inspectors.
Reply With Quote