Thread: G04
View Single Post
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2013, 20:37
PAR_WIG1350's Avatar
PAR_WIG1350 PAR_WIG1350 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alan Wells
FRC #1350 (Rambots)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,190
PAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond reputePAR_WIG1350 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: G04

Regardless of whether or not there is a precedent for discrimination, complaining here is not the best way to encourage change. Somehow, we need to express displeasure directly to FIRST if we truly want to be heard.

That being said, there is nothing in the rules that prohibits the use of robot parts to remove robots from the pyramid. Any tool that you might need to reach the release could be attached to a length of wire rope bolted to the frame and stowed on the bottom of the robot.

Similarly, fold-down, locking handles to allow shorter people to lift a robot that is otherwise above their reach could be bolted on and then only one person tall enough to release the handles is needed.

After the match the size constraints no longer apply, which gives more freedom in designing the retrieval assisting mechanisms. There is still a penalty in the form of weight and volume occupied by these elements, but any robot that can climb that high will already be devoting a lot of weight and volume to that mechanism. I hope this helps.
__________________