View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 15-01-2013, 20:48
Tristan Lall's Avatar
Tristan Lall Tristan Lall is offline
Registered User
FRC #0188 (Woburn Robotics)
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 2,484
Tristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond reputeTristan Lall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: R32 and the use of Electrical solenoid actuators

Quote:
Originally Posted by rsisk View Post
What is the difference between these two things?
The door lock actuators described above are an electric motor hooked to a lead screw and/or reduction gears (like this). The solenoid actuators (like the ones Alan linked) don't have motors inside.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeleslie View Post
So basically if it has a field coil and doesn't rotate then it qualifies. Like a striker on a doorbell or a small starter solenoid? or am i missing something.
We've argued about this definition in the past. My impression is that a solenoid actuator necessarily implies a proper solenoid (i.e. an energized coil that produces a substantially uniform magnetic field in the space along the length of its internal axis, with a plunger that moves along that axis, through that space, as a result of the electrical current supplied to the coil); others have suggested that a less restrictive definition satisfies the rule. In my opinion, a conventional electric bell is not a solenoid actuator.
Reply With Quote