|
Re: Team Update 1-15-2013
This rule change may be because it was difficult to enforce the previous one, but it certainly wasn't impossible. We are engineers, and if you are building your robot fit inside a vertical cylinder you probably can find a way to prove that it resides in it. I know they aren't set up for it but maybe there are autonomous ways to call violations of this rule. Four cameras mounted far above the pyramids with a little logic to determine if there is a 54" violation? Maybe that's just a dumb idea I thought of while writing this response but I do think it could be enforced. I know someone could think of a way. Just because it would be difficult to do so is something is a reason they should have thought about before releasing the rules, or the Q&A, or the second Q&A...
__________________
2016 (mentor/drive-coach)
Quarter-Finalist-Einstein, Winner-Carson Division Champs, Winner-10K Lakes, Chairman's Award-10K Lakes, Finalists-Lake Superior,
Winner-MSHSL Robotics Competition
2015 (mentor/drive-coach)
Finalists-10K Lakes, Finalists-Lake Superior, Finalist-MSHL Robotics Competition, Quarter-Finalist-Galileo Division Champs
2014 (mentor/drive-coach)
Winner-10K Lakes, Winner-Lake Superior Winner-MSHSL Robotics Competition, Quarter-Finalist-Galileo Division Champs
2013 (mentor/drive-coach)
Winner-10K Lakes, Winner-Lake Superior, Winner-MSHSL Robotics Competition, Quarter-Finalist-Newton Division Champs
2012 (mentor/drive-coach)
Finalists-Lake Superior, Semi-Finalist-MSHSL State Championship, Semi-Finalists at 10,000 Lakes
2008-2011 (college mentor)
2007 (driver)
Quarter Finalist-Milwaukee
|