Thread: OPR, and CCWM 2013
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-01-2013, 11:45
IKE's Avatar
IKE IKE is offline
Not so Custom User Title
AKA: Isaac Rife
no team (N/A)
Team Role: Mechanical
  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,149
IKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond repute
Re: OPR, and CCWM 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by xSAWxBLADEx View Post
Did the calculation for the OPR/CCWM change for 2013? If so, what is the calculation for those?
Not from previous years other than 2012. In 2012, a lot of folks assigned points for doing a Co-Op balance as the game would frequently take high point makers out of the action early to co-op.

In 2011, there was a ranking mechanism that made "close high scoring matches" favorable. Because of this, some teams would choose a strategy that would maximize their seeding poitns as opposed to maximizing their match points. This strategy tended to cause some inaccuracy with OPR, and a ton of inaccuracy with CCWM (in my opinion).