Thread: Is this Legal?
View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-01-2013, 22:45
GaryVoshol's Avatar
GaryVoshol GaryVoshol is offline
Cogito ergo arbitro
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Posts: 5,752
GaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond reputeGaryVoshol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Is this Legal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryVoshol View Post
Yes, but then search the Q&A for a recent item regarding G30 and G18-1. If you do it so it looks like a strategy, you might get a yellow card.
Sorry, I got a couple of Team Updates and Q&A's mixed up, going just by memory. It's not a yellow card, but it is a technical and the other alliance won't get a penalty.
Quote:
G18-1
Strategies aimed solely at forcing the opposing ALLIANCE to violate a rule are not in the spirit of FRC and are not allowed. Rule violations forced in this manner will not result in assessment of a penalty on the target ALLIANCE .
Violation: TECHNICAL FOUL

Quote:
Now ask yourself why you want to even think about doing this?
Given the ineffectiveness of this strategy and how it goes totally against GP, the other part of my answer deserves being repeated and emphasized.
__________________
(since 2004)
Reply With Quote