View Single Post
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2013, 19:33
FrankJ's Avatar
FrankJ FrankJ is offline
Robot Mentor
FRC #2974 (WALT)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 1,923
FrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond reputeFrankJ has a reputation beyond repute
Re: It is our position that PVC pipe shall not be used as a means of transporting com

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tristan Lall View Post
I suspect that with the inclusion of plasticizers, a PVC pipe could be produced that did not exhibit this failure behaviour.

It's an overreach to take the position that "PVC pipe shall not be used as a means of transporting compressed air" without qualifying the pipe's composition, manufacturing process, installation and operating conditions. Despite their strongly-worded statements, I hope that OSHA is recognizing competent engineering as the appropriate way to circumvent their prohibition.
PVC pipe manufacturers also say do not use PVC pipe for compressed air systems. The big problem is that it shatters on failure. That warning along with the OSHA statement is enough for me not to use on compressed air systems. For OSHA competent engineering means following their warnings.

One possibility is the fitting was overtightened, starting the failure.

Last edited by FrankJ : 27-01-2013 at 19:37.
Reply With Quote