Quote:
Originally Posted by dodar
Even though I echo most everyone's sentiments that 67 has been one of the most dominant teams in FIRST, I would have to say that 2056 takes the prize and only doesnt in your calculations because they havent been around but more than 6 years(this is their 7th). Even though 2056 has never won the NCA or the WC, they are like 16/16 at regionals and have gone to 2/6 Einsteins. Their accomplishments over the time period they have been around, to me at least, seems to be the best ratio in first.(Note, I'm considering a minimum of 5 years in FRC)
|
Except Jim's calculations are a weighted average that more or less removes anything more than 4 years ago from the equation.