Quote:
Originally Posted by dodar
But it's just for championships.
|
We need to define best for this discussion... My definition is that they have repeated high level performance, demonstrated inspiration, and are widely recognized by their peers for their efforts. Most of the teams we have been discussing meet these criteria.
IF we were looking solely at robot performance... then there is only one stage worth looking at. I'd even argue that any team that has never made Einstein can't be on that list. But I honestly believe that teams that do not have a repeated history of high level performance at Championships cannot be considered even for my definition of best. This includes multiple Einstein appearances and numerous EI/CA wins at both local and championship wins (obviously HoF status counts)...
Based on these criteria 67 is the best. The only teams I would consider as an argument would be 111, 254, and 1114.
(of note, my list earlier in this thread used a different metric, it was for 'most dominant robot' not best team)