View Single Post
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 17-02-2013, 12:53
Mk.32's Avatar
Mk.32 Mk.32 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Mark
FRC #2485 (W.A.R. Lords)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 770
Mk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud ofMk.32 has much to be proud of
Re: Broken PD board terminal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricVanWyk View Post
As an inspector and the PD designer, I would be extremely hesitant to pass a PD with a repaired shank, for two reasons:

1) Safety. There is too much current in that connection for me to be comfortable with a rework. The shanks are force fit with enough pressure to cold-weld the square pins to the too-small round holes to better connect it to the >8 oz copper layers.

2) As a favor to the field crew, the CSA(s), and the team. It is extremely likely that a faulty repair here will randomly and briefly re-break and then re-attach, causing the robot to reboot and/or fail on the field. It simply isn't worth the risk.

That isn't to say that it is impossible to do correctly - I am just saying that it is a difficult high risk low reward rework.
Just wondering, why the 6mm threads and not just a 1/4-20?

I have seen a few teams break them because they try to use a 1/4-20 Nut on the shank. I am wondering if this is how this team broke it as well....
__________________
Engineering mentor: Team 2485: WARLords 2013-

Team President: Team 3647 2010-2013