Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg McKaskle
The spreadsheet represents how it would execute if the code and wait were serialized. Since there isn't a data connection, the delay and code run in parallel.
|
Hmm. Referring to this paper:
http://team358.org/files/programming...Everything.PDF
... it looks like the 10ms wait causes an average execution time of 12 ms, whereas the "wait until next multiple" averages 10ms. That's why I assumed the wait was serialized.
Mark, could you expound on that?
(I deleted the original post pending resolution of this. I don't want anyone to be misled by it.)