Thread: Climbing with CIM's: Versaplanetary Vs. P80 Vs. Multistage Planrtary/Spur Combo
View Single Post
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-02-2013, 21:53
Paul Copioli's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero Woodie Flowers Award
Paul Copioli Paul Copioli is offline
President, VEX Robotics, Inc.
FRC #3310 (Black Hawk Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
  
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Rockwall, TX
Posts: 1,389
Paul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Climbing with CIM's: Versaplanetary Vs. P80 Vs. Multistage Planrtary/Spur Combo
All,

First off, the load rating for the VP is very comservative so I think using the VP in this instance is fine.

Also, since the rating is based on the ultimate stress failure of the aluminum hex, going to a single stage gearbox with a 7075 aluminum shaft (or unhardened steel shaft) won't be any better.

In any case, you should be fine with the VP direct to your output for the climber.
__________________
In full disclosure I am the President of VEX Robotics, a division of Innovation First International.