View Single Post
  #105   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-03-2013, 19:05
MikeE's Avatar
MikeE MikeE is offline
Wrecking nice beaches since 1990
no team (Volunteer)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: New England -> Alaska
Posts: 381
MikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond repute
Re: What we learned from week 1

Quote:
Originally Posted by jspatz1 View Post
This rule has always been in effect for any change, major or minor, at any time in the event. Nothing new.
I don't think anyone objects to reinspection for major modification such as adding a mechanism (active or passive) per rule T11, but it is impractical to reinspect for every modification. If you follow the letter rather than the spirit of the rules, which of these would *not* require a reinspection?
  1. Filing down a corner to give better clearance between parts
  2. Replacing a nut with a locknut
  3. replacing a faulty motor
  4. ziptie several wires together
  5. updating a timeout in the code
  6. adding an accelerometer sensor
Reply With Quote