Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeE
I don't think anyone objects to reinspection for major modification such as adding a mechanism (active or passive) per rule T11, but it is impractical to reinspect for every modification. If you follow the letter rather than the spirit of the rules, which of these would *not* require a reinspection? - Filing down a corner to give better clearance between parts
- Replacing a nut with a locknut
- replacing a faulty motor
- ziptie several wires together
- updating a timeout in the code
- adding an accelerometer sensor
|
T10, but technically, yes, that's true. I think certain things, from a practicality standpoint, can be ignored. IMHO, it only elicits a full reinspection after a visible physical change.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by T10
If a ROBOT is modified after it has passed Inspection, other than modifications described in T8, that ROBOT must be re-Inspected.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by T10 Blue Box
If an observation is made that another Team’s ROBOT may be in violation of the ROBOT rules, please approach FIRST officials to review the matter in question. This is an area where Gracious ProfessionalismTM is very important.
|