View Single Post
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-03-2013, 22:59
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 19,752
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Scoring 2013, I can do better than that!

Quote:
Originally Posted by MotorHead View Post
What about the use of RFID? They put RFID tags in all kinds of things now for tracking purposes. In the triathlon world it is very effective at tracking athletes on a course. They can even embed them in the ear of my dog. So I don't think size would be a major drawback to performance of a game piece.

Biggest drawback is added cost to game piece.
Hmmm.... That COULD work. However, there are a number of potential concerns I would have.

1) Range. Where I've seen RFID used tends to be very short-range applications, like reading a badge. I'm not saying it can't be long-range, because I don't know the maximum range, but that's a definite consideration.
2) Cost. You need to be able to get the equipment and use it with every game piece (though reading equipment could be used year-to-year as needed).
3) Putting one in every game piece...time is not in your favor.
4) Read speed--with the volume of pieces coming in at any given time, a quick read is a must--there isn't very long where a piece is in range.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots
2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics
2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk

Reply With Quote