View Single Post
  #159   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-03-2013, 14:21
GBilletdeaux930's Avatar
GBilletdeaux930 GBilletdeaux930 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Greg
FRC #0930 (Mukwonago Bears)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Milwaukee,Wisconsin
Posts: 171
GBilletdeaux930 is a name known to allGBilletdeaux930 is a name known to allGBilletdeaux930 is a name known to allGBilletdeaux930 is a name known to allGBilletdeaux930 is a name known to allGBilletdeaux930 is a name known to all
Re: What we learned from week 1

Scoring is very fair this year. Not nearly as one sided as years like 2007.

When I did the averages, they came out to be around 19 pts in Auton, 19 pts in Tele, and 16 pts in climbing per alliance.

I suppose this could be improved slightly by finding a way to increase climbing scores just a hair, and the way to do this may be increasing to 10, 20, 40 like others have suggested. But eliminating the 10pt climb will drop that average down severely, and raising the 10pt to something else will raise the average severely too.

I don't expect these scores to change too much. Comparing to years like 2008 where every method of point scoring was viable and would win you regionals (see 148), there was absolutely no change in scores from week 1 to week 6.

Last year, as more and more teams began balancing, the scores went up 33% from week 1 to week 6 but I don't see more teams climbing to 30 because of one fact. About half the teams I've seen climb, climb on the inside or would be hindered by a robot climbing on the inside. At champs, yeah I bet we'd see 3 corner climbers. At regionals, I don't expect it to be as prevalent and teams will continue to pick robots for their shooting ability, not their preferred climbing area. Especially since their aren't enough climbers to guarantee a climbing alliance.

If there is an increase in scores, it'll be because of more 10 pt hangers, or robots perfecting their shooting and finding those sweet spots.
Reply With Quote