View Single Post
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-03-2013, 21:39
joelg236 joelg236 is offline
4334 Retired Mentor & Alumni
AKA: Joel Gallant
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 733
joelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond reputejoelg236 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Instant Replay Challenge—A Thought Exercise

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
FIRST already applies countermeasures (refs, judges, and inspectors can't ref, judge, or inspect their own teams, or if they do, their lead knows that they're affiliated with that team), so maybe just having those will work. Or maybe not. YMTC* on that.
As far as I'm concerned, the system works close to as good as it can. Others would probably disagree, but I don't see how it could get less unbiased apart from AI (uh, sure...). Rules are a different story (there could always be more specific rules, which I'm a fan of), but in terms of an "unbiased" judging system for calls, even professional sports that have millions of dollars behind them still use refs.
__________________
All opinions are my own.
Reply With Quote