[Aidan S.]

Originally Posted by faust1706

but I guess there are a decent amount of examples where an alliance has no competition...case in point: finals of galileo of 2011: 101 - 0.

I want to clarify that fact, since I was playing on the alliance that won that match (Final 1-1). We won the match because of a red card called on team 254 for an incursion into our protected scoring zone (it was a very complicated call though, as the incursion wasn't the sole reason for the card, just the start of the sequence of events that lead to the red card). The original score of the match had the blue alliance of 254-111-973 beating the red alliance 469-610-188 by about 10 points (the score was around 111-101). The blue alliance rallied back to win the next two matches, move on to Einstein, and claim the 2011 title in four very well played and impressive matches.

The vast majority of zero scores in eliminations are the result of a red card and not because of an alliance that can't score.

I apologise for going off topic from the original post, I just wanted to point out that that specific match was very close with two strong alliances, and the only reason we won by such a large margin was because of a disqualification, not because the other alliance was not competitive. The two championship blue banners won by that alliance prove how strong they were. This match was the only loss that this alliance took on their outstanding championship run, and it was not a true loss, rather the result of a red card from an unlucky position that 254 got into. The alliance of 254-111-973 was the closest thing to a perfect 10 match championship elimination win in recent memory, such an exceptional alliance and set of matches.